Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)

Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current
24.79
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea
23.82
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current rank
5th
Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea rank
6th

Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of) over time

  • Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current
  • Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea
10203040200020072015

How they compare

Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current currently reports 24.79 against 23.82 in Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea, a difference of 0.97.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current ahead.

Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current ranks 5th and Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea ranks 6th of 64 countries.

Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea Difference Ahead
2000s 33.53 21.82 11.71 Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current
2010s 23.82 22.5 1.31 Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of), Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current or Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea?
Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current, at 24.79 against 23.82 in Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea as of 2015.
What is the difference in indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of) between Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current and Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea?
0.97, with Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current and Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea?
16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
How do Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current and Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea rank globally for indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of)?
Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current ranks 5th and Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea ranks 6th of 64 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/indicator-for-coastal-eutrophication-potential-icep-kilograms-of-carbon-from-algae/large-marine-ecosystem-kuroshio-current/large-marine-ecosystem-sulu-celebes-sea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/indicator-for-coastal-eutrophication-potential-icep-kilograms-of-carbon-from-algae/large-marine-ecosystem-kuroshio-current/large-marine-ecosystem-sulu-celebes-sea/">Large Marine Ecosystem: Kuroshio Current vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Sulu-Celebes Sea: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
66 places, 1,056 data points, 2000–2015
Last refreshed