Large Marine Ecosystem: Pacific Central-American Coastal vs Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)
Large Marine Ecosystem: Pacific Central-American Coastal
-2.84
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea
26.63
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: Pacific Central-American Coastal rank
2nd
Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea rank
3rd
Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of) over time
- Large Marine Ecosystem: Pacific Central-American Coastal
- Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea
How they compare
Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea currently reports 26.63 against -2.84 in Large Marine Ecosystem: Pacific Central-American Coastal, a difference of 29.47.
That makes Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea's figure about 9.4 times Large Marine Ecosystem: Pacific Central-American Coastal's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea has been ahead every year.
Large Marine Ecosystem: Pacific Central-American Coastal ranks 2nd and Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea ranks 3rd of 2 groups.
Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Large Marine Ecosystem: Pacific Central-American Coastal | Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -5.46 | 23.17 | 28.63 | Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea |
| 2010s | -4.38 | 26.4 | 30.78 | Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of), Large Marine Ecosystem: Pacific Central-American Coastal or Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea?
- Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea, at 26.63 against -2.84 in Large Marine Ecosystem: Pacific Central-American Coastal as of 2015.
- What is the difference in indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of) between Large Marine Ecosystem: Pacific Central-American Coastal and Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea?
- 29.47, with Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Large Marine Ecosystem: Pacific Central-American Coastal and Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
- How do Large Marine Ecosystem: Pacific Central-American Coastal and Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea rank globally for indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of)?
- Large Marine Ecosystem: Pacific Central-American Coastal ranks 2nd and Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea ranks 3rd of 2 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.