Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)

Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea
26.63
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea
28.61
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea rank
3rd
Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea rank
2nd

Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of) over time

  • Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea
  • Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea
0102030200020072015

How they compare

Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea currently reports 28.61 against 26.63 in Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea, a difference of 1.98.

That makes Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea's figure about 1.1 times Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea has been ahead every year.

Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea ranks 3rd and Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea ranks 2nd of 64 countries.

Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea Difference Ahead
2000s 23.17 27.76 4.59 Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea
2010s 26.4 29.7 3.29 Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of), Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea or Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea?
Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea, at 28.61 against 26.63 in Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea as of 2015.
What is the difference in indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of) between Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea?
1.98, with Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea?
16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
How do Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea rank globally for indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of)?
Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea ranks 3rd and Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea ranks 2nd of 64 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/indicator-for-coastal-eutrophication-potential-icep-kilograms-of-carbon-from-algae/large-marine-ecosystem-south-china-sea/large-marine-ecosystem-yellow-sea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/indicator-for-coastal-eutrophication-potential-icep-kilograms-of-carbon-from-algae/large-marine-ecosystem-south-china-sea/large-marine-ecosystem-yellow-sea/">Large Marine Ecosystem: South China Sea vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Yellow Sea: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
66 places, 1,056 data points, 2000–2015
Last refreshed