Australia and New Zealand vs Eastern and South-Eastern Asia: Material footprint, by type of raw material

Australia and New Zealand
998.62 million
in 2022
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
45.42 billion
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand rank
1st
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia rank
3rd

Material footprint, by type of raw material over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B200020122024

How they compare

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia currently reports 45.42 billion against 998.62 million in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 44.42 billion.

That makes Eastern and South-Eastern Asia's figure about 45.5 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Eastern and South-Eastern Asia has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Eastern and South-Eastern Asia ranks 3rd of 2 countries.

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Eastern and South-Eastern Asia Difference Ahead
2000s 885.60 million 22.87 billion 21.98 billion Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
2010s 951.14 million 40.25 billion 39.29 billion Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
2020s 992.86 million 45.51 billion 44.52 billion Eastern and South-Eastern Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher material footprint, by type of raw material, Australia and New Zealand or Eastern and South-Eastern Asia?
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia, at 45.42 billion against 998.62 million in Australia and New Zealand as of 2022.
What is the difference in material footprint, by type of raw material between Australia and New Zealand and Eastern and South-Eastern Asia?
44.42 billion, with Eastern and South-Eastern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Eastern and South-Eastern Asia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Eastern and South-Eastern Asia rank globally for material footprint, by type of raw material?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Eastern and South-Eastern Asia ranks 3rd of 2 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Material footprint, by type of raw material (tonnes). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Eastern and South-Eastern Asia: Material footprint, by type of raw material. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/material-footprint-by-type-of-raw-material-tonnes/australia-and-new-zealand/eastern-and-south-eastern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/material-footprint-by-type-of-raw-material-tonnes/australia-and-new-zealand/eastern-and-south-eastern-asia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Eastern and South-Eastern Asia: Material footprint, by type of raw material</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Material footprint, by type of raw material (tonnes)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
36 places, 828 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed