Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Material footprint per capita, by type of raw material

Australia and New Zealand
31.87
in 2022
Central America
94.33
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand rank
1st
Central America rank
1st

Material footprint per capita, by type of raw material over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Central America
20406080100200020112022

How they compare

Central America currently reports 94.33 against 31.87 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 62.46.

That makes Central America's figure about 3.0 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Central America ranks 1st of 2 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Central America in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Central America Difference Ahead
2000s 36.26 11.17 25.09 Australia and New Zealand
2010s 33.53 16.21 17.32 Australia and New Zealand
2020s 31.7 84.56 52.86 Central America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher material footprint per capita, by type of raw material, Australia and New Zealand or Central America?
Central America, at 94.33 against 31.87 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2022.
What is the difference in material footprint per capita, by type of raw material between Australia and New Zealand and Central America?
62.46, with Central America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Central America?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Central America rank globally for material footprint per capita, by type of raw material?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Central America ranks 1st of 2 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Material footprint per capita, by type of raw material (tonnes). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Material footprint per capita, by type of raw material. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/material-footprint-per-capita-by-type-of-raw-material-tonnes/australia-and-new-zealand/central-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/material-footprint-per-capita-by-type-of-raw-material-tonnes/australia-and-new-zealand/central-america/">Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Material footprint per capita, by type of raw material</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Material footprint per capita, by type of raw material (tonnes)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
36 places, 828 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed