Slovenia vs United States of America: Net ODA provided, total
Net ODA provided, total over time
- Slovenia
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes United States of America's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United States of America ahead.
Slovenia ranks 24th and United States of America ranks 22nd of 32 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | United States of America |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda provided, total, Slovenia or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Slovenia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net oda provided, total between Slovenia and United States of America?
- 0.0%, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and United States of America?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2017.
- How do Slovenia and United States of America rank globally for net oda provided, total?
- Slovenia ranks 24th and United States of America ranks 22nd of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net ODA provided, total (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Official development assistance (ODA) comprises grants or loans to developing countries and territories on the OECD/DAC list of aid recipients that are undertaken by the official sector with promotion of economic development and welfare as the main objective and at concessional financial terms. It is shown as a share of donors' GNI.