Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs South Africa: Number of local breeds for which sufficient genetic resources
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
6
in 2025
South Africa
4
in 2025
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
20th
South Africa rank
22nd
Number of local breeds for which sufficient genetic resources over time
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- South Africa
How they compare
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 6 against 4 in South Africa, a difference of 2.
That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 1.5 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2020 it was South Africa ahead.
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 20th and South Africa ranks 22nd of 26 groups.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of local breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or South Africa?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 6 against 4 in South Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of local breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and South Africa?
- 2, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2025.
- How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and South Africa rank globally for number of local breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 20th and South Africa ranks 22nd of 26 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.