Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Number of local breeds (not extinct)

Australia and New Zealand
143
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
798
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
13th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
10th

Number of local breeds (not extinct) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
0200400600800200020122025

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 798 against 143 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 655.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 5.6 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th of 199 countries.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 39.4 389.3 349.9 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2010s 69.4 669.7 600.3 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 109 732.83 623.83 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of local breeds (not extinct), Australia and New Zealand or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 798 against 143 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in number of local breeds (not extinct) between Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
655, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for number of local breeds (not extinct)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds (not extinct) (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Number of local breeds (not extinct). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-number/australia-and-new-zealand/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-number/australia-and-new-zealand/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Number of local breeds (not extinct)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of local breeds (not extinct) (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
234 places, 5,835 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed