Australia and New Zealand vs Romania: Number of local breeds (not extinct)
Australia and New Zealand
143
in 2025
Romania
93
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
13th
Romania rank
16th
Number of local breeds (not extinct) over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Romania
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 143 against 93 in Romania, a difference of 50.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.5 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Romania ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Romania ranks 16th of 199 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.4 | 88.5 | 49.1 | Romania |
| 2010s | 69.4 | 93 | 23.6 | Romania |
| 2020s | 109 | 93 | 16 | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of local breeds (not extinct), Australia and New Zealand or Romania?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 143 against 93 in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of local breeds (not extinct) between Australia and New Zealand and Romania?
- 50, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Romania rank globally for number of local breeds (not extinct)?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Romania ranks 16th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds (not extinct) (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.