Australia and New Zealand vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Number of local breeds (not extinct)

Australia and New Zealand
143
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa
794
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
13th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
12th

Number of local breeds (not extinct) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0200400600800200020122025

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 794 against 143 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 651.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 5.6 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 12th of 199 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 39.4 405.5 366.1 Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 69.4 701.2 631.8 Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 109 746.17 637.17 Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of local breeds (not extinct), Australia and New Zealand or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 794 against 143 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in number of local breeds (not extinct) between Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa?
651, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for number of local breeds (not extinct)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 12th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds (not extinct) (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Number of local breeds (not extinct). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-number/australia-and-new-zealand/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-number/australia-and-new-zealand/sub-saharan-africa/">Australia and New Zealand vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Number of local breeds (not extinct)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of local breeds (not extinct) (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
234 places, 5,835 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed