Australia vs Central Asia: Number of local breeds (not extinct) (number)
Australia
74
in 2025
Central Asia
155
in 2025
Australia rank
27th
Central Asia rank
28th
Number of local breeds (not extinct) (number) over time
- Australia
- Central Asia
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 155 against 74 in Australia, a difference of 81.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 2.1 times Australia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 27th and Central Asia ranks 28th of 200 countries.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Central Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.2 | 70.9 | 42.7 | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 53.4 | 120 | 66.6 | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 68.67 | 137.5 | 68.83 | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of local breeds (not extinct), Australia or Central Asia?
- Central Asia, at 155 against 74 in Australia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of local breeds (not extinct) between Australia and Central Asia?
- 81, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Central Asia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Central Asia rank globally for number of local breeds (not extinct)?
- Australia ranks 27th and Central Asia ranks 28th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds (not extinct) (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.