Australia and New Zealand vs Namibia: Number of local breeds with unknown risk status
Australia and New Zealand
23
in 2025
Namibia
23
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
45th
Namibia rank
45th
Number of local breeds with unknown risk status over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Namibia
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 23 against 23 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 45th and Namibia ranks 45th of 199 countries.
Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.3 | 10.2 | 18.1 | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | 62.4 | 10.3 | 52.1 | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 36.17 | 8.33 | 27.83 | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of local breeds with unknown risk status, Australia and New Zealand or Namibia?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 23 against 23 in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of local breeds with unknown risk status between Australia and New Zealand and Namibia?
- 0, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Namibia rank globally for number of local breeds with unknown risk status?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 45th and Namibia ranks 45th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.