Chad vs Oceania: Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number)
Chad
35
in 2025
Oceania
87
in 2025
Chad rank
34th
Oceania rank
31st
Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number) over time
- Chad
- Oceania
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 87 against 35 in Chad, a difference of 52.
That makes Oceania's figure about 2.5 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Oceania ahead.
Chad ranks 34th and Oceania ranks 31st of 200 countries.
Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.5 | 51.5 | 32 | Oceania |
| 2010s | 35 | 122 | 87 | Oceania |
| 2020s | 35 | 99.5 | 64.5 | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of local breeds with unknown risk status, Chad or Oceania?
- Oceania, at 87 against 35 in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of local breeds with unknown risk status between Chad and Oceania?
- 52, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Oceania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Oceania rank globally for number of local breeds with unknown risk status?
- Chad ranks 34th and Oceania ranks 31st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.