Faroe Islands vs Latvia: Number of local breeds with unknown risk status
Faroe Islands
0
in 2025
Latvia
0
in 2025
Faroe Islands rank
162nd
Latvia rank
162nd
Number of local breeds with unknown risk status over time
- Faroe Islands
- Latvia
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 0 against 0 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Faroe Islands ranks 162nd and Latvia ranks 162nd of 173 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.6 | 5.4 | 4.8 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.3 | 3 | 1.7 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of local breeds with unknown risk status, Faroe Islands or Latvia?
- Faroe Islands, at 0 against 0 in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of local breeds with unknown risk status between Faroe Islands and Latvia?
- 0, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Faroe Islands and Latvia rank globally for number of local breeds with unknown risk status?
- Faroe Islands ranks 162nd and Latvia ranks 162nd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.