Georgia vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Number of local breeds with unknown risk status

Georgia
36
in 2025
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
64
in 2025
Georgia rank
31st
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
33rd

Number of local breeds with unknown risk status over time

  • Georgia
  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
0204060200020122025

How they compare

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) currently reports 64 against 36 in Georgia, a difference of 28.

That makes Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s figure about 1.8 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 31st and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 33rd of 199 countries.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Difference Ahead
2000s 10 23.2 13.2 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
2010s 16.9 59.6 42.7 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
2020s 26.5 63.33 36.83 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of local breeds with unknown risk status, Georgia or Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), at 64 against 36 in Georgia as of 2025.
What is the difference in number of local breeds with unknown risk status between Georgia and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
28, with Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank globally for number of local breeds with unknown risk status?
Georgia ranks 31st and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 33rd of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Number of local breeds with unknown risk status. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-local-breeds-with-unknown-risk-status-number/georgia/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-local-breeds-with-unknown-risk-status-number/georgia/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/">Georgia vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Number of local breeds with unknown risk status</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
234 places, 5,835 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed