Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Number of local breeds with unknown risk status
Kyrgyzstan
26
in 2025
Namibia
23
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
33rd
Namibia rank
34th
Number of local breeds with unknown risk status over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 26 against 23 in Namibia, a difference of 3.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 33rd and Namibia ranks 34th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.4 | 10.2 | 4.8 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 22.9 | 10.3 | 12.6 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 26 | 8.33 | 17.67 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of local breeds with unknown risk status, Kyrgyzstan or Namibia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 26 against 23 in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of local breeds with unknown risk status between Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 3, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Namibia rank globally for number of local breeds with unknown risk status?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 33rd and Namibia ranks 34th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.