Melanesia vs Northern America: Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number)
Melanesia
35
in 2025
Northern America
64
in 2025
Melanesia rank
34th
Northern America rank
32nd
Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number) over time
- Melanesia
- Northern America
How they compare
Northern America currently reports 64 against 35 in Melanesia, a difference of 29.
That makes Northern America's figure about 1.8 times Melanesia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Northern America ahead.
Melanesia ranks 34th and Northern America ranks 32nd of 200 countries.
Northern America has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Northern America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13 | 29.9 | 16.9 | Northern America |
| 2010s | 33.4 | 38.4 | 5 | Northern America |
| 2020s | 35 | 45.33 | 10.33 | Northern America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of local breeds with unknown risk status, Melanesia or Northern America?
- Northern America, at 64 against 35 in Melanesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of local breeds with unknown risk status between Melanesia and Northern America?
- 29, with Northern America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Northern America?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Melanesia and Northern America rank globally for number of local breeds with unknown risk status?
- Melanesia ranks 34th and Northern America ranks 32nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.