Middle Africa vs Romania: Number of local breeds with unknown risk status
Middle Africa
128
in 2025
Romania
93
in 2025
Middle Africa rank
5th
Romania rank
6th
Number of local breeds with unknown risk status over time
- Middle Africa
- Romania
How they compare
Middle Africa currently reports 128 against 93 in Romania, a difference of 35.
That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.4 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Middle Africa ahead.
Middle Africa ranks 5th and Romania ranks 6th of 20 regions.
Middle Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.4 | 56 | 2.4 | Middle Africa |
| 2010s | 124.5 | 90.3 | 34.2 | Middle Africa |
| 2020s | 126.83 | 93 | 33.83 | Middle Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of local breeds with unknown risk status, Middle Africa or Romania?
- Middle Africa, at 128 against 93 in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of local breeds with unknown risk status between Middle Africa and Romania?
- 35, with Middle Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Middle Africa and Romania rank globally for number of local breeds with unknown risk status?
- Middle Africa ranks 5th and Romania ranks 6th of 20 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.