Nepal vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Number of local breeds with unknown risk status

Nepal
33
in 2025
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
64
in 2025
Nepal rank
35th
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
33rd

Number of local breeds with unknown risk status over time

  • Nepal
  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
0204060200020122025

How they compare

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) currently reports 64 against 33 in Nepal, a difference of 31.

That makes Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s figure about 1.9 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 35th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 33rd of 199 countries.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Difference Ahead
2000s 18.9 23.2 4.3 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
2010s 33 59.6 26.6 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
2020s 33 63.33 30.33 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of local breeds with unknown risk status, Nepal or Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), at 64 against 33 in Nepal as of 2025.
What is the difference in number of local breeds with unknown risk status between Nepal and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
31, with Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Nepal and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank globally for number of local breeds with unknown risk status?
Nepal ranks 35th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 33rd of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Number of local breeds with unknown risk status. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-local-breeds-with-unknown-risk-status-number/nepal/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-local-breeds-with-unknown-risk-status-number/nepal/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/">Nepal vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Number of local breeds with unknown risk status</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
234 places, 5,835 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed