Nepal vs Oceania: Number of local breeds with unknown risk status
Nepal
33
in 2025
Oceania
87
in 2025
Nepal rank
29th
Oceania rank
27th
Number of local breeds with unknown risk status over time
- Nepal
- Oceania
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 87 against 33 in Nepal, a difference of 54.
That makes Oceania's figure about 2.6 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 29th and Oceania ranks 27th of 173 countries.
Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.9 | 51.5 | 32.6 | Oceania |
| 2010s | 33 | 122 | 89 | Oceania |
| 2020s | 33 | 99.5 | 66.5 | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of local breeds with unknown risk status, Nepal or Oceania?
- Oceania, at 87 against 33 in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of local breeds with unknown risk status between Nepal and Oceania?
- 54, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Oceania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Nepal and Oceania rank globally for number of local breeds with unknown risk status?
- Nepal ranks 29th and Oceania ranks 27th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.