Nepal vs Southern Africa: Number of local breeds with unknown risk status
Nepal
33
in 2025
Southern Africa
98
in 2025
Nepal rank
29th
Southern Africa rank
26th
Number of local breeds with unknown risk status over time
- Nepal
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Southern Africa currently reports 98 against 33 in Nepal, a difference of 65.
That makes Southern Africa's figure about 3.0 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 29th and Southern Africa ranks 26th of 173 countries.
Southern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.9 | 40 | 21.1 | Southern Africa |
| 2010s | 33 | 82.1 | 49.1 | Southern Africa |
| 2020s | 33 | 83.33 | 50.33 | Southern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of local breeds with unknown risk status, Nepal or Southern Africa?
- Southern Africa, at 98 against 33 in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of local breeds with unknown risk status between Nepal and Southern Africa?
- 65, with Southern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Southern Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Nepal and Southern Africa rank globally for number of local breeds with unknown risk status?
- Nepal ranks 29th and Southern Africa ranks 26th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.