Romania vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Number of local breeds with unknown risk status
Romania
93
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa
658
in 2025
Romania rank
6th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
5th
Number of local breeds with unknown risk status over time
- Romania
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 658 against 93 in Romania, a difference of 565.
That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 7.1 times Romania's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th of 173 countries.
Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56 | 279 | 223 | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2010s | 90.3 | 592 | 501.7 | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2020s | 93 | 610.17 | 517.17 | Sub-Saharan Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of local breeds with unknown risk status, Romania or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Sub-Saharan Africa, at 658 against 93 in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of local breeds with unknown risk status between Romania and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 565, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Romania and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for number of local breeds with unknown risk status?
- Romania ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.