Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct)

Australia and New Zealand
246
in 2025
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
295
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
3rd
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
12th

Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
50100150200250300200020122025

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 295 against 246 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 49.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 12th of 206 countries.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 127.2 170.1 42.9 Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 193.1 291.9 98.8 Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 222.33 292.17 69.83 Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of transboundary breeds (not extinct), Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 295 against 246 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
49, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for number of transboundary breeds (not extinct)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 12th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-transboundary-breeds-not-extinct-number/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-transboundary-breeds-not-extinct-number/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
241 places, 6,042 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed