Belgium vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status
Belgium
77
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa
232
in 2025
Belgium rank
6th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
3rd
Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status over time
- Belgium
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 232 against 77 in Belgium, a difference of 155.
That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 3.0 times Belgium's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 3rd of 179 countries.
Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.1 | 127 | 91.9 | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2010s | 36.6 | 233.2 | 196.6 | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2020s | 49.17 | 229.33 | 180.17 | Sub-Saharan Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status, Belgium or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Sub-Saharan Africa, at 232 against 77 in Belgium as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status between Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 155, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status?
- Belgium ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 3rd of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.