Central and Southern Asia vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status

Central and Southern Asia
140
in 2025
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
62
in 2025
Central and Southern Asia rank
15th
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
12th

Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status over time

  • Central and Southern Asia
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
050100150200020122025

How they compare

Central and Southern Asia currently reports 140 against 62 in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 78.

That makes Central and Southern Asia's figure about 2.3 times Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Central and Southern Asia has been ahead every year.

Central and Southern Asia ranks 15th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 12th of 35 groups.

Central and Southern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central and Southern Asia Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
2000s 81.9 53.8 28.1 Central and Southern Asia
2010s 141.2 63.9 77.3 Central and Southern Asia
2020s 146.83 54.5 92.33 Central and Southern Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status, Central and Southern Asia or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Central and Southern Asia, at 140 against 62 in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2025.
What is the difference in number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status between Central and Southern Asia and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
78, with Central and Southern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central and Southern Asia and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Central and Southern Asia and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status?
Central and Southern Asia ranks 15th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 12th of 35 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central and Southern Asia vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-transboundary-breeds-with-unknown-risk-status-number/central-and-southern-asia/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-transboundary-breeds-with-unknown-risk-status-number/central-and-southern-asia/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Central and Southern Asia vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
241 places, 6,042 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed