Central Asia vs Zimbabwe: Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status
Central Asia
69
in 2025
Zimbabwe
46
in 2025
Central Asia rank
23rd
Zimbabwe rank
21st
Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status over time
- Central Asia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 69 against 46 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 23.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Central Asia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 32 groups.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.1 | 22.8 | 6.3 | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 53.8 | 41.5 | 12.3 | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 65 | 38.67 | 26.33 | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status, Central Asia or Zimbabwe?
- Central Asia, at 69 against 46 in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status between Central Asia and Zimbabwe?
- 23, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Central Asia and Zimbabwe rank globally for number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status?
- Central Asia ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.