Chile vs Middle Africa: Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status
Chile
78
in 2025
Middle Africa
96
in 2025
Chile rank
5th
Middle Africa rank
5th
Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status over time
- Chile
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Middle Africa currently reports 96 against 78 in Chile, a difference of 18.
That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 5th and Middle Africa ranks 5th of 179 countries.
Middle Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.4 | 47.3 | 3.9 | Middle Africa |
| 2010s | 80.3 | 102.1 | 21.8 | Middle Africa |
| 2020s | 77.5 | 99 | 21.5 | Middle Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status, Chile or Middle Africa?
- Middle Africa, at 96 against 78 in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status between Chile and Middle Africa?
- 18, with Middle Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Middle Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Middle Africa rank globally for number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status?
- Chile ranks 5th and Middle Africa ranks 5th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.