China vs Northern Africa: Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status
China
37
in 2025
Northern Africa
51
in 2025
China rank
29th
Northern Africa rank
27th
Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status over time
- China
- Northern Africa
How they compare
Northern Africa currently reports 51 against 37 in China, a difference of 14.
That makes Northern Africa's figure about 1.4 times China's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China ahead.
China ranks 29th and Northern Africa ranks 27th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Northern Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Northern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.6 | 30.2 | 8.4 | China |
| 2010s | 70.6 | 59.9 | 10.7 | China |
| 2020s | 43.5 | 50.33 | 6.83 | Northern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status, China or Northern Africa?
- Northern Africa, at 51 against 37 in China as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status between China and Northern Africa?
- 14, with Northern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Northern Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do China and Northern Africa rank globally for number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status?
- China ranks 29th and Northern Africa ranks 27th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.