Northern Africa vs Romania: Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status
Northern Africa
51
in 2025
Romania
44
in 2025
Northern Africa rank
27th
Romania rank
24th
Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status over time
- Northern Africa
- Romania
How they compare
Northern Africa currently reports 51 against 44 in Romania, a difference of 7.
That makes Northern Africa's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Romania ahead.
Northern Africa ranks 27th and Romania ranks 24th of 32 groups.
Northern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Africa | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.2 | 23.3 | 6.9 | Northern Africa |
| 2010s | 59.9 | 40.6 | 19.3 | Northern Africa |
| 2020s | 50.33 | 43.33 | 7 | Northern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status, Northern Africa or Romania?
- Northern Africa, at 51 against 44 in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status between Northern Africa and Romania?
- 7, with Northern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Northern Africa and Romania rank globally for number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status?
- Northern Africa ranks 27th and Romania ranks 24th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.