Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Russian Federation: Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
60
in 2025
Russian Federation
45
in 2025
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
29th
Russian Federation rank
28th

Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Russian Federation
020406080200020122025

How they compare

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) currently reports 60 against 45 in Russian Federation, a difference of 15.

That makes Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s figure about 1.3 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 29th and Russian Federation ranks 28th of 35 groups.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2000s 25.7 27.7 2 Russian Federation
2010s 56.3 64 7.7 Russian Federation
2020s 59 62 3 Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Russian Federation?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), at 60 against 45 in Russian Federation as of 2025.
What is the difference in number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Russian Federation?
15, with Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Russian Federation?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Russian Federation rank globally for number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 29th and Russian Federation ranks 28th of 35 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Russian Federation: Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-transboundary-breeds-with-unknown-risk-status-number/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-transboundary-breeds-with-unknown-risk-status-number/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/russian-federation/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Russian Federation: Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
241 places, 6,042 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed