India vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant

India
77.5%
in 2022
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
74.2%
in 2022
India rank
4th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
3rd

Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant over time

  • India
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
20406080201620192022

How they compare

India currently reports 77.5% against 74.2% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 3.3%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2017 it was India ahead.

India ranks 4th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd of 50 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 78.2% 32.3% 45.9% India
2020s 80.6% 73.7% 7.0% India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant, India or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
India, at 77.5% against 74.2% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2022.
What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant between India and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
3.3%, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2022.
How do India and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant?
India ranks 4th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-escherichia-coli-resistant-to-3rd-generation/india/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-escherichia-coli-resistant-to-3rd-generation/india/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">India vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
66 places, 407 data points, 2016–2022
Last refreshed