Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Uganda: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
74.2%
in 2022
Uganda
81.8%
in 2022
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
3rd
Uganda rank
2nd

Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • Uganda
20406080201620192022

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 81.8% against 74.2% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 7.6%.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Uganda ahead.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd and Uganda ranks 2nd of 16 groups.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Uganda Difference Ahead
2010s 38.4% 53.1% 14.7% Uganda
2020s 73.7% 83.4% 9.7% Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or Uganda?
Uganda, at 81.8% against 74.2% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2022.
What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Uganda?
7.6%, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Uganda?
5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2022.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Uganda rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd and Uganda ranks 2nd of 16 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Uganda: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-escherichia-coli-resistant-to-3rd-generation/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-escherichia-coli-resistant-to-3rd-generation/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/uganda/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Uganda: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
66 places, 407 data points, 2016–2022
Last refreshed