Lao People's Democratic Republic vs United Arab Emirates: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant

Lao People's Democratic Republic
52.6%
in 2022
United Arab Emirates
52.4%
in 2022
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
17th
United Arab Emirates rank
19th

Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • United Arab Emirates
0204060201720192022

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 52.6% against 52.4% in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.2%.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2017 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 17th and United Arab Emirates ranks 19th of 50 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
2010s 46.9% 47.5% 0.6% United Arab Emirates
2020s 49.7% 52.7% 3.0% United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant, Lao People's Democratic Republic or United Arab Emirates?
Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 52.6% against 52.4% in United Arab Emirates as of 2022.
What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant between Lao People's Democratic Republic and United Arab Emirates?
0.2%, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and United Arab Emirates?
6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2022.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and United Arab Emirates rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 17th and United Arab Emirates ranks 19th of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs United Arab Emirates: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-escherichia-coli-resistant-to-3rd-generation/lao-pdr/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-escherichia-coli-resistant-to-3rd-generation/lao-pdr/united-arab-emirates/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs United Arab Emirates: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
66 places, 407 data points, 2016–2022
Last refreshed