Mali vs Northern Africa and Western Asia: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant

Mali
60.9%
in 2022
Northern Africa and Western Asia
52.4%
in 2022
Mali rank
10th
Northern Africa and Western Asia rank
7th

Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant over time

  • Mali
  • Northern Africa and Western Asia
0204060201620192022

How they compare

Mali currently reports 60.9% against 52.4% in Northern Africa and Western Asia, a difference of 8.5%.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.2 times Northern Africa and Western Asia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Northern Africa and Western Asia ahead.

Mali ranks 10th and Northern Africa and Western Asia ranks 7th of 50 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Northern Africa and Western Asia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Northern Africa and Western Asia Difference Ahead
2010s 35.9% 54.7% 18.8% Northern Africa and Western Asia
2020s 56.0% 53.7% 2.3% Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant, Mali or Northern Africa and Western Asia?
Mali, at 60.9% against 52.4% in Northern Africa and Western Asia as of 2022.
What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant between Mali and Northern Africa and Western Asia?
8.5%, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Northern Africa and Western Asia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
How do Mali and Northern Africa and Western Asia rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant?
Mali ranks 10th and Northern Africa and Western Asia ranks 7th of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Northern Africa and Western Asia: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-escherichia-coli-resistant-to-3rd-generation/mali/northern-africa-and-western-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-escherichia-coli-resistant-to-3rd-generation/mali/northern-africa-and-western-asia/">Mali vs Northern Africa and Western Asia: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
66 places, 407 data points, 2016–2022
Last refreshed