Mali vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant

Mali
60.9%
in 2022
Small island developing States (SIDS)
50.0%
in 2022
Mali rank
10th
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
8th

Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant over time

  • Mali
  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
0204060201820202022

How they compare

Mali currently reports 60.9% against 50.0% in Small island developing States (SIDS), a difference of 10.9%.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.2 times Small island developing States (SIDS)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Small island developing States (SIDS) ahead.

Mali ranks 10th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 8th of 50 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Small island developing States (SIDS) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Small island developing States (SIDS) Difference Ahead
2010s 35.9% 45.9% 10.0% Small island developing States (SIDS)
2020s 56.0% 43.4% 12.6% Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant, Mali or Small island developing States (SIDS)?
Mali, at 60.9% against 50.0% in Small island developing States (SIDS) as of 2022.
What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant between Mali and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
10.9%, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
How do Mali and Small island developing States (SIDS) rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant?
Mali ranks 10th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 8th of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-escherichia-coli-resistant-to-3rd-generation/mali/small-island-developing-states-sids/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-escherichia-coli-resistant-to-3rd-generation/mali/small-island-developing-states-sids/">Mali vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
66 places, 407 data points, 2016–2022
Last refreshed