Nepal vs Oman: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant
Nepal
77.1%
in 2022
Oman
78.2%
in 2022
Nepal rank
5th
Oman rank
3rd
Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant over time
- Nepal
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 78.2% against 77.1% in Nepal, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 5th and Oman ranks 3rd of 50 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 71.3% | 53.5% | 17.8% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 76.8% | 73.7% | 3.1% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant, Nepal or Oman?
- Oman, at 78.2% against 77.1% in Nepal as of 2022.
- What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant between Nepal and Oman?
- 1.1%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Oman?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Nepal and Oman rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant?
- Nepal ranks 5th and Oman ranks 3rd of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.