Nepal vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant
Nepal
77.1%
in 2022
Sub-Saharan Africa
70.6%
in 2022
Nepal rank
5th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
5th
Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant over time
- Nepal
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 77.1% against 70.6% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 6.5%.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 5th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th of 50 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 71.3% | 52.5% | 18.8% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 76.8% | 70.2% | 6.6% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant, Nepal or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Nepal, at 77.1% against 70.6% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant between Nepal and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 6.5%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Nepal and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant?
- Nepal ranks 5th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.