Oman vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant
Oman
78.2%
in 2022
Sub-Saharan Africa
70.6%
in 2022
Oman rank
3rd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
5th
Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant over time
- Oman
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Oman currently reports 78.2% against 70.6% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 7.6%.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
Oman ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th of 50 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 52.1% | 51.5% | 0.6% | Oman |
| 2020s | 73.7% | 70.2% | 3.5% | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant, Oman or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Oman, at 78.2% against 70.6% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant between Oman and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 7.6%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2022.
- How do Oman and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant?
- Oman ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.