Australia and New Zealand vs Tunisia: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant

Australia and New Zealand
15.0%
in 2022
Tunisia
13.6%
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand rank
30th
Tunisia rank
33rd

Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Tunisia
0102030201620192022

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 15.0% against 13.6% in Tunisia, a difference of 1.4%.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 30th and Tunisia ranks 33rd of 50 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Tunisia Difference Ahead
2010s 23.6% 19.3% 4.3% Australia and New Zealand
2020s 16.5% 15.0% 1.5% Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant, Australia and New Zealand or Tunisia?
Australia and New Zealand, at 15.0% against 13.6% in Tunisia as of 2022.
What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant between Australia and New Zealand and Tunisia?
1.4%, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Tunisia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Tunisia rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 30th and Tunisia ranks 33rd of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Tunisia: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-methicillin-resistant-staphylococcus-aureus/australia-and-new-zealand/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-methicillin-resistant-staphylococcus-aureus/australia-and-new-zealand/tunisia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Tunisia: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
65 places, 396 data points, 2016–2022
Last refreshed