Eastern and South-Eastern Asia vs Laos: Percentage of bloodstream infection due … methicillin-resistant

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
41.3%
in 2022
Laos
55.9%
in 2022
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia rank
9th
Laos rank
6th

Percentage of bloodstream infection due … methicillin-resistant over time

  • Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
  • Laos
102030405060201720192022

How they compare

Laos currently reports 55.9% against 41.3% in Eastern and South-Eastern Asia, a difference of 14.6%.

That makes Laos's figure about 1.4 times Eastern and South-Eastern Asia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Eastern and South-Eastern Asia ahead.

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia ranks 9th and Laos ranks 6th of 15 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Eastern and South-Eastern Asia averaged higher in 1 and Laos in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern and South-Eastern Asia Laos Difference Ahead
2010s 32.9% 9.0% 24.0% Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
2020s 37.5% 45.3% 7.7% Laos

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant, Eastern and South-Eastern Asia or Laos?
Laos, at 55.9% against 41.3% in Eastern and South-Eastern Asia as of 2022.
What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant between Eastern and South-Eastern Asia and Laos?
14.6%, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern and South-Eastern Asia and Laos?
6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2022.
How do Eastern and South-Eastern Asia and Laos rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant?
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia ranks 9th and Laos ranks 6th of 15 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia vs Laos: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-methicillin-resistant-staphylococcus-aureus/eastern-and-south-eastern-asia/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-methicillin-resistant-staphylococcus-aureus/eastern-and-south-eastern-asia/lao-pdr/">Eastern and South-Eastern Asia vs Laos: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
65 places, 396 data points, 2016–2022
Last refreshed