Egypt vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant

Egypt
69.4%
in 2022
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
53.8%
in 2022
Egypt rank
2nd
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
3rd

Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant over time

  • Egypt
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
020406080100201620192022

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 69.4% against 53.8% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 15.6%.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.3 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 2nd and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd of 44 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 75.0% 21.0% 54.0% Egypt
2020s 87.3% 62.2% 25.0% Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant, Egypt or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Egypt, at 69.4% against 53.8% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2022.
What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant between Egypt and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
15.6%, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
How do Egypt and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant?
Egypt ranks 2nd and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd of 44 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-methicillin-resistant-staphylococcus-aureus/egypt-arab-rep/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-methicillin-resistant-staphylococcus-aureus/egypt-arab-rep/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Egypt vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
61 places, 372 data points, 2016–2022
Last refreshed