India vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant

India
54.9%
in 2022
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
53.8%
in 2022
India rank
6th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
3rd

Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant over time

  • India
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
020406080201620192022

How they compare

India currently reports 54.9% against 53.8% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 1.1%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2017 it was India ahead.

India ranks 6th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd of 44 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 58.7% 17.2% 41.6% India
2020s 58.4% 62.2% 3.9% Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant, India or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
India, at 54.9% against 53.8% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2022.
What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant between India and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
1.1%, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2022.
How do India and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant?
India ranks 6th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd of 44 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-methicillin-resistant-staphylococcus-aureus/india/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-methicillin-resistant-staphylococcus-aureus/india/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">India vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
61 places, 372 data points, 2016–2022
Last refreshed