Jordan vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant

Jordan
76.3%
in 2022
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
53.8%
in 2022
Jordan rank
1st
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
3rd

Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant over time

  • Jordan
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
020406080201620192022

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 76.3% against 53.8% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 22.5%.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.4 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 1st and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd of 44 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 60.1% 21.0% 39.1% Jordan
2020s 68.5% 62.2% 6.2% Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant, Jordan or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Jordan, at 76.3% against 53.8% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2022.
What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant between Jordan and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
22.5%, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
How do Jordan and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant?
Jordan ranks 1st and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd of 44 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-methicillin-resistant-staphylococcus-aureus/jordan/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-methicillin-resistant-staphylococcus-aureus/jordan/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Jordan vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
61 places, 372 data points, 2016–2022
Last refreshed