Laos vs Nigeria: Percentage of bloodstream infection due … methicillin-resistant
Laos
55.9%
in 2022
Nigeria
65.1%
in 2022
Laos rank
6th
Nigeria rank
4th
Percentage of bloodstream infection due … methicillin-resistant over time
- Laos
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 65.1% against 55.9% in Laos, a difference of 9.2%.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.2 times Laos's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 6th and Nigeria ranks 4th of 50 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.4% | 64.3% | 53.8% | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 45.3% | 69.1% | 23.8% | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant, Laos or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 65.1% against 55.9% in Laos as of 2022.
- What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant between Laos and Nigeria?
- 9.2%, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Nigeria?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2022.
- How do Laos and Nigeria rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant?
- Laos ranks 6th and Nigeria ranks 4th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.