Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Nigeria: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
61.8%
in 2022
Nigeria
65.1%
in 2022
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
1st
Nigeria rank
4th

Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Nigeria
20406080201620192022

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 65.1% against 61.8% in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 3.3%.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 1st and Nigeria ranks 4th of 15 groups.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Nigeria Difference Ahead
2010s 30.9% 64.3% 33.4% Nigeria
2020s 51.6% 69.1% 17.5% Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 65.1% against 61.8% in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2022.
What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Nigeria?
3.3%, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Nigeria?
5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2022.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Nigeria rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 1st and Nigeria ranks 4th of 15 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Nigeria: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-methicillin-resistant-staphylococcus-aureus/least-developed-countries-ldcs/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-methicillin-resistant-staphylococcus-aureus/least-developed-countries-ldcs/nigeria/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Nigeria: Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
65 places, 396 data points, 2016–2022
Last refreshed