Australia and New Zealand vs United States of America: Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ

Australia and New Zealand
333,342
in 2024
United States of America
584,724
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
6th
United States of America rank
4th

Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • United States of America
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k199520092024

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 584,724 against 333,342 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 251,382.

That makes United States of America's figure about 1.8 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th and United States of America ranks 4th of 126 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 137,153 409,471 272,318 United States of America
2000s 195,954 461,321 265,367 United States of America
2010s 269,909 566,917 297,008 United States of America
2020s 322,147 584,724 262,577 United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ, Australia and New Zealand or United States of America?
United States of America, at 584,724 against 333,342 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ between Australia and New Zealand and United States of America?
251,382, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and United States of America?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and United States of America rank globally for plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th and United States of America ranks 4th of 126 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs United States of America: Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number/australia-and-new-zealand/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number/australia-and-new-zealand/united-states/">Australia and New Zealand vs United States of America: Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
161 places, 2,414 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed