Australia vs Central and Southern Asia: Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ

Australia
297,198
in 2024
Central and Southern Asia
600,977
in 2024
Australia rank
7th
Central and Southern Asia rank
9th

Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ over time

  • Australia
  • Central and Southern Asia
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k199520092024

How they compare

Central and Southern Asia currently reports 600,977 against 297,198 in Australia, a difference of 303,779.

That makes Central and Southern Asia's figure about 2.0 times Australia's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Central and Southern Asia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 7th and Central and Southern Asia ranks 9th of 126 countries.

Central and Southern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Central and Southern Asia Difference Ahead
1990s 117,758 289,810 172,052 Central and Southern Asia
2000s 169,554 405,782 236,228 Central and Southern Asia
2010s 235,472 541,493 306,022 Central and Southern Asia
2020s 286,003 595,442 309,439 Central and Southern Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ, Australia or Central and Southern Asia?
Central and Southern Asia, at 600,977 against 297,198 in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ between Australia and Central and Southern Asia?
303,779, with Central and Southern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Central and Southern Asia?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Australia and Central and Southern Asia rank globally for plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ?
Australia ranks 7th and Central and Southern Asia ranks 9th of 126 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Central and Southern Asia: Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number/australia/central-and-southern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number/australia/central-and-southern-asia/">Australia vs Central and Southern Asia: Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
161 places, 2,414 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed