Ecuador vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ

Ecuador
29,756
in 2024
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
5,182
in 2024
Ecuador rank
37th
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
35th

Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ over time

  • Ecuador
  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
010.0k20.0k30.0k199520092024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 29,756 against 5,182 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 24,574.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 5.7 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 37th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 35th of 126 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Difference Ahead
1990s 20,253 1,073 19,180 Ecuador
2000s 22,932 1,805 21,128 Ecuador
2010s 27,676 3,560 24,116 Ecuador
2020s 29,413 4,952 24,462 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ, Ecuador or Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
Ecuador, at 29,756 against 5,182 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2024.
What is the difference in plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ between Ecuador and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
24,574, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank globally for plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ?
Ecuador ranks 37th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 35th of 126 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number/ecuador/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number/ecuador/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/">Ecuador vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
161 places, 2,414 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed