Ethiopia vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ

Ethiopia
73,459
in 2024
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
256,491
in 2024
Ethiopia rank
16th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
2nd

Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k199520092024

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 256,491 against 73,459 in Ethiopia, a difference of 183,032.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 3.5 times Ethiopia's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia ranks 16th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd of 114 countries.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 52,024 158,428 106,404 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2000s 61,642 185,774 124,132 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2010s 71,988 239,898 167,910 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 73,223 255,240 182,017 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ, Ethiopia or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 256,491 against 73,459 in Ethiopia as of 2024.
What is the difference in plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ between Ethiopia and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
183,032, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Ethiopia and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ?
Ethiopia ranks 16th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number/ethiopia/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number/ethiopia/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Ethiopia vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
155 places, 2,324 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed