Kenya vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ

Kenya
51,405
in 2024
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
256,491
in 2024
Kenya rank
21st
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
9th

Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ over time

  • Kenya
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k199520092024

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 256,491 against 51,405 in Kenya, a difference of 205,086.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 5.0 times Kenya's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Kenya ranks 21st and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th of 114 countries.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 43,722 158,428 114,706 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2000s 46,258 185,774 139,516 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2010s 50,292 239,898 189,607 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 51,405 255,240 203,835 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ, Kenya or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 256,491 against 51,405 in Kenya as of 2024.
What is the difference in plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ between Kenya and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
205,086, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Kenya and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ?
Kenya ranks 21st and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number/kenya/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number/kenya/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Kenya vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
155 places, 2,324 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed